America at it Again
Published on January 9, 2004 By OccultPizza In Politics
Published on Wednesday, January 7, 2004 by the Toronto Star

US 'Targets Minorities'

New Rules Amount to Racial Profiling, Critics Suggest
They're 'not going to make America more secure'

by Nicholas Keung and Tracy Huffman

New American security measures that require fingerprints and photographs of millions of visitors a year won't make the U.S. any safer, but will further stigmatize Canada's landed immigrants as potential terrorists, community activists say.


Unfortunately, the terrorist attacks have changed our life and the way we view things. For the U.S. government, racial profiling seems to be the answer to the threat," said John Asfour, spokesperson for the Canadian Arab Federation.

"The new rule targets racial minorities on both sides of the border and will only further anger the enemy, so to speak."

Kimberly Weissman, of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, said the increased security measures under the United States Visitor and Immigrant Status Indicator Technology program, or US-VISIT, are part of the administration's anti-terrorism initiative.

Weissman said although exemptions apply for residents of many countries, officials may use their own discretion.

"This is not a discriminatory program," she said. "Based on intelligence information or national security information ... an inspector may feel that someone needs further questioning or further processing. ... It is very situational."

By the end of this year, the program will be implemented at all border crossings and apply to people coming in and out of U.S., Weissman said.

Alex Swann, spokesperson for Canada's Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness Department, played down the program's potential impact on Canadian travelers.

"The majority of students and workers with student visas and some work permits should be okay as long as they have no (visa) stickers in their passports," he said in an interview yesterday. "The sticker is the flag."

Swann said Canadian officials have been working closely with their American counterparts on border security since the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks on the United States and had been consulted on the launch of the program.

He said Canada has no plans yet to follow some European countries and implement digitized fingerprints on its passports. "We take policy based on our Canadian needs. We are not going to rule in or rule out on that," he said.

Critics see the new U.S. program as an attack on civil liberties.

"The US-VISIT program is not going to make America more secure," said Avvy Go, of the Metro Toronto Chinese and Southeast Asian Legal Clinic. "Real terrorists are not going to enter the States through visas anyway, and there will always be home-grown terrorists, like Timothy McVeigh, in their country."

Go said Canada has already created two classes of people by requiring landed immigrants to acquire a permanent resident card to get in and out of the country, and the US-VISIT program is going to further stigmatize Canada's immigrants, who are not exempt from the new border rules.

Asfour agrees. "Under the banner of national security, the U.S. government has taken away the basic civil rights of its people and the rights of others in the world. It raises serious personal privacy concerns," he said.

Go said Canadians should find the initiative offensive. "All our immigrants have been screened for security concerns when they move to Canada. Basically what the Americans are saying is, `Sorry, we don't trust your process and we see them as potential terrorists.'"

Copyright Toronto Star Newspapers Limited

[zombienote: Both the War on(some)Drugs (WOD) and the War on Terror (WOT) are racist from the foundation up.

Racial profiling is very familar to those who have followed the war on some drugs for any length of time.The school raid in Goose Creek in Novemebr is an example of racial profiling still being central to the WOD. Tulia, Texas, another.

The WOD and the War on Terror, of course, are being blended together at ever opportunity possible.

Canada gets an extra kick of dirt in the face because they are at such a variance with the Bush Empire regarding cannabis reform and pharmaceuticals. The Bush people hate Canada's freedoms as well.]

Comments
on Jan 09, 2004
Actually I'm doing this all ass backwards and responding to a thread that started before Christmas. Because... well, how could I be sure this message was ever seen if it was attached to such an old piece. This is about the article God's Plan. Could it make any sense to answer to all that tragedy that I don't have a real answer, that there is no real answer. Why do we try to answer pain? What you do with pain is heal it. I can tell you, in the last few years I have been through such a road that I am just able to believe again. I didn't even know I had stopped believing. In fact, I can tell you what I stopped believing in: the goodness of Christians. I thought that because I had no trouble believing in Jesus, because I still went to Mass I still believed in Christianity. But you know what? When I stopped expecting to find charity in a church, when I stopped expecting goodness from fellow Christians that's when I stopped believing. And when it came again, by surprise and in an unexpected place, that's when I believed again. The whole business about God being a man.... God is our father in heaven and out mother in earth. God is all around. God is certainly not a man... at least, not if he is not a woman. God is not Christ alone, unless he is Krishna. That's what Saint Paul means when he says that faith believes in all things. That what Saint John means when he says, God is love. Love is all we have, and we'd better do all we can with it. I don't know that if that explains matters. But I don't know what else is worth saying.
on Jan 15, 2004
What you say is true. It is wierd to live in America and hear from other Nations citizens' that they don't believe in denial of civil rights and privacy as America accepts. I guess we might as well get used to it, unless you're an illegal Mexican because they don't need to tell anyone or worry about accountability from Homeland Security.